Search found 51 matches
- 02 January 2024, 17:28
- Forum: COCO (AmsterCHEM)
- Topic: solver problem when using Chemsep property package
- Replies: 5
- Views: 60068
Re: solver problem when using Chemsep property package
Ghadi, I suspect the PSRK fitted group interaction parameters (GIPs) does not extrapolate to temperatures above 300 degrees C. Your incoming stream is 1400 C! I checked and the PSRK model flash worked up to 500 C but then its limits are reached, most likely because one of the GIPs approaches to valu...
- 28 April 2021, 17:22
- Forum: Process Modelling Components
- Topic: Air Separation Unit from COCO Sample Flowsheets
- Replies: 2
- Views: 30192
Re: Air Separation Unit from COCO Sample Flowsheets
I computed the first ratio incorrectly and as a result the product slate changed. I corrected the calculation and saw the flow ratio's needed to be 7.85 and 0.17. I then noticed that the rich liquid feed to the low pressure column was changing its quality (i.e. the ratio of L/V). This is because I h...
- 28 April 2021, 11:48
- Forum: Process Modelling Components
- Topic: Air Separation Unit from COCO Sample Flowsheets
- Replies: 2
- Views: 30192
Re: Air Separation Unit from COCO Sample Flowsheets
Yes it is possible but you need to carefully adjust two specifications for the low pressure column that is flow rate specific, namely the side stream rates out of the low pressure column to (1) the waste and (2) the argon side rectification column. I suggest you to first replace them by relative flo...
- 21 February 2021, 17:33
- Forum: ChemSep Property Package
- Topic: Error with Chemsep Property Package and Heater/Cooler unit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 15015
Re: Error with Chemsep Property Package and Heater/Cooler un
This is fixed with release 8v25 of ChemSep of 17th Feb 2021
-Harry
-Harry
- 06 October 2020, 14:08
- Forum: TEA Thermodynamic server (AmsterCHEM)
- Topic: combining two property packages within one
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30600
Re: combining two property packages within one
an interesting idea. I guess this should be fixed at the PME level? I mean CS/copp makes a whole set of properties available like the K values, enthalpies and entropies, as well as physical properties but it is the PME that should offer the choice to not all use a cocktail of propeties i.e. K values...
- 06 October 2020, 14:03
- Forum: ChemSep Property Package
- Topic: property package for condensable polar gases
- Replies: 5
- Views: 15351
Re: property package for condensable polar gases
Why don't you share the collected validation data on the forum? Then there is more information to help you.
Harry
Harry
- 16 September 2020, 20:35
- Forum: ChemSep Property Package
- Topic: editing Extended Antoine parameters within Chemsep
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12093
Re: editing Extended Antoine parameters within Chemsep
Please download and install a new ChemSep LITE. This weekend an update was made available that should help to fix the problem of not storing information.
-Harry
-Harry
- 10 October 2019, 22:06
- Forum: COCO (AmsterCHEM)
- Topic: Absorber
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18423
Re: Absorber
You should consider running parametric studies inside ChemSep. To do so, open up the column and go to the cape-open panel. First switch off Cape-Open properties. This will allow you to run parametric studies on the column. Then define your thermo again. Once you defined that, you can solve inside th...
- 10 September 2019, 23:21
- Forum: COCO (AmsterCHEM)
- Topic: crude oil
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11499
Re: crude oil
Enter ChemSep gui. Please start the PCD manager by clicking on the Benzene ring icon. Now close the existing opened library with File-Close. Navigate to Edit-Add Pseudo. Select Kesler-Lee 1976 for the Tc and Pc, w and Mw. Use Riazi-Daubert 1980 for the Vc and CpIG. You can use Twu 1984 for viscosity...
- 28 January 2019, 21:59
- Forum: COCO (AmsterCHEM)
- Topic: distillation bug
- Replies: 19
- Views: 81998
Re: distillation bug
There was a bug in the most recent version of ChemSep that caused the assignment of CAPE-OPEN parameters to fail. This is fixed. It is better to reconnect all information to ensure the parameters are passed on. I don't know whether your operation can work though, that is something you need to check ...